Tuesday, October 22, 2019

Comparison of the Terms in Debates

Comparison of the Terms in Debates There are many concepts that are frequently used and misused by people in debates or conversations. Among them one can single out such terms as facts, information, data, knowledge, and understanding. Some of them such as facts and information are often viewed as interchangeable notions, even though they can have significant differences.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Comparison of the Terms in Debates specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More This essay will compare their meaning of these notions and explain how they differ from one another and what kind of similarities they have. This discussion can highlight some of the major misconceptions of about these notions and show how they need to be applied in conversation or written speech. First of all, such term as fact can be understood as a verifiable truth that has been proven in a logical or empirical way. Overall, it is an observation that has been tested and substantiated by objective methods. For instance, the statement that World War I began in 1914 can be called a fact. This notion should not be confused with such word as data. This concept means a series of measurements and observations that can be either true or untrue. This is the main distinction between facts and data. However, these terms do have some similarity. They are not very meaningful if they are not systematized or ordered in a certain way. The thing is that they are not always put in any specific context. Thus, one can come to the third important notion, namely information. It can be defined as the sequence of facts or data that have some meaning because they have been ordered or organized. In other words, they can be understood as a message by a person. In turn, such concepts as knowledge and understanding are also very similar but not interchangeable. The term knowledge means the state of awareness about something. For instance, a person can know certain information or separate f acts. More importantly, he or she can even apply this knowledge. For instance, people can know and apply mathematical formulas or algorithms, however, they cannot always tell why these formulas work. This is why such notion as understanding is more complex. It means that a person does not only know certain information, but is able to evaluate it and determine whether it is true or untrue. For example, some people not only know mathematical formulas but they can also tell why they are valid. The term understanding also implies the ability to see causal relationship between facts or events. Thus, this notion has a wider meaning and people should be able to distinguish between knowing and understanding, especially when they debate about something.Advertising Looking for essay on rhetoric? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More This discussion of these concepts is important because it shows that they cannot always be used inter changeable even despite their similarities. For instance, when people speak about data, they should not assume that these data are always true. Similarly, separate facts cannot be viewed as information because they are often meaningless. Furthermore, people should remember that knowledge is not synonymous to understanding because understanding means that an individual can interpret specific facts and explain why they are true. The problem is that these terms are often used in political, economic, or social debates. Moreover, some people can manipulate these terms in order to affect the audience. A person, who can see the distinction between them, can better resist such manipulation and identify flawed arguments.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.